Generative AI has become one of the most controversial and widespread topics of modern technology. While educating myself on the meaning and purpose of artificial intelligence, I can acknowledge the improvements and setbacks this platform offers, specifically for college students.
As a junior in college on the pre-law track, working towards a degree in English, it is important to recognize the impact of AI on English majors. AI, being a large language model, is shaped by previously prompted thoughts, ideas, and texts.
According to the article, “Is AI the 'End of the English Major'?” by Stony Brook University, on Long Island, AI can summarize texts, create essays, and generate quick responses based on published information. This article argues that although AI can handle specific aspects of English assignments and studies as a whole, deeper critical analysis, understanding a text's narrative, interpreting current and past news sources, and writing to their fullest potential are skills that are acquired through practice and education.
Andrew Newman, a professor and chair of the English department at Stony Brook University, argues that the human brain, through study and education processes, interprets information far differently than AI. Newman claims there is much more depth and original insight from a human brain than from an online-generated source.
As a determined and passionate undergraduate student, it is not only crucial to recognize the impact of AI on my major, but also to identify its place in my future career as a lawyer.
An Article published by Harvard Law School, “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Law Firms’ Business Models,” contends that generative AI can improve productivity and efficiency in the legal field. This article claims that productivity will be increased in each individual lawyer due to less research time and more time allotted for critical thinking and application. It also suggests that if lawyers have more time to work through strategies and analysis, they are likely to improve their skills and knowledge by focusing more time on a case and the individual client.
A concern of many aspiring lawyers is that AI will replace their position or limit hiring opportunities. This article claims that many firms do not anticipate a reduction in hiring rates, and human lawyers are essential. It also suggests that lawyers who are versatile and adapt to generative AI will be viewed as valuable assets to the firm. This article proves that with adaptability and understanding, AI Legal positions will not be replaced, but enhanced.
In the broader context and with full transparency, when I first gained admission to High Point University, the topic of generative AI was just beginning to gain popularity. My goals of attending an undergraduate school were to gain an accelerated education, find my independence, and grow academically and personally.
Through AI’s rapid growth, my goals have remained the same, and my aspirations continue to flourish. As an educated young adult, I understand the role of technology in the modern world. I strive to accept these initiatives and learn to adapt, rather than neglecting the topic all together.
I firmly believe that, through research, analysis, and understanding of the risks and benefits of AI as a society, we can adapt to these changes and coexist with this technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment